IndusInd Bank shares tumble 5% after RBI move; what RBL, Bandhan, Federal Bank history suggests

IndusInd Bank Ltd saw its shares tumbling 5 per cent in Monday’s trade after a cloud of uncertainty emerged over the leadership following the RBI’s decision to extend the prevailing CEO’s term to one year against three years that was sought by the private lender. Despite reports suggesting that Nippon Life is considering buying stake in IndusInd Bank, stock analysts said the likelihood of it is low.

Following the two developments, the stock fell 5.38 per cent to hit a low Rs 886.40 on BSE. With this, the banking stock is down 17 per cent in the past one month.

Analysts now largely believe that a leadership transition is in place and believes Deputy CEO & CFO Arun Khurana could be the front-runner for the CEO post. In the previous examples of Bandhan Bank and Federal Bank, where the extensions to CEOs were given for a shorter periods, the stocks had fallen in the run up to the announcements.

IIFL Securities noted that MD & CEO Sumant Kathpalia has been granted only a one-year extension. His previous re-appointment in March 2023 was also for a reduced tenure of 2 years instead of the 3 years requested by the bank.

“We believe one-year extension is to give enough time to the board to find a replacement, and should create leadership uncertainty in the interim. In similar instances at other banks previously – RBL (1 years extension against 3 yrs requested), Bandhan (3 years vs 5 years) and Federal (not approving last 1 yr extension) – there was a negative price stock reaction in the run up to the announcement s(1-14 per cent), but the stock prices recovered from their lows in the coming months,” IIFL Securities said.

The brokerage said weak profitability even in FY26, coupled with the leadership uncertainty should keep the stock price under pressure. It keep its estimates unchanged but cut target price to Rs 91.

“In our view, over 30 per cent correction in the stock price in the past six months presents an opportunity to buy into a franchise available at a sharp discount of 0.85x FY27E P/BV, as the most negative outcome will mostly be priced in. Even as we expect no near-term positive triggers, valuation juxtaposed to franchise value suggests a favorable risk-reward in the long term. Thus, we revise to Accumulate from Buy with a reduced target of Rs 1,050 from Rs 1,320,” said Elara Securities.

Jefferies has retained its ‘Buy’ rating, but cut its target to Rs 1,080 from Rs 1,200 earlier. UBS has downgrade the stock to ‘Sell and suggested a target price of Rs 850. Citi maintained its ‘Buy’ and suggested a target of Rs 1,378. Goldman Sachs is Neutral with a target of Rs 964. For Macquarie, the ‘Outperform’ call stayed. It has a target of Rs 1,210 per share on IndusInd Bank. BofA Securities has cut its target to Rs 850 and suggested ‘Underperform’.

“We expect the stock to be under pressure, despite the sharp correction, given low visibility, expectations of a soft Q4FY25E and uncertainty on top management. The CFO had also resigned recently,” Nuvama said.

MOFSL has cut its FY26 and FY27 earnings estimates by 9 per cent and 10 per cent and estimated IndusInd Bank to deliver return on asset (RoA) of 1.3 per cent in FY26 and 1.4 per cent in FY27.

“We believe that at the current valuations IIB is already pricing in most of these uncertainties, and notwithstanding near-term negativity, we find the current valuations inexpensive, particularly as operating performance starts to recover in FY26. Maintain Buy with a revised target of Rs 1,100,” MOFSL said.

Eqwires Research Analyst

Top-notch SEBI registered research analyst

Best SEBI registered Intraday tips provider

info@eqwires.com

Telegram Facebook Instagram

Call: +91 9624421555 / +91 9624461555

www.eqwires.com

Crude oil gains as Russia’s Novak hints at OPEC+ output reversal

Crude oil prices rose by 1.28% to settle at ₹5,858, supported by comments from Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, who hinted that OPEC+ might reconsider its output increase after April. This statement fueled optimism in the market, despite a 5% decline in China’s crude oil imports in the first two months of 2025. The drop in imports was attributed to stricter U.S. sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil shipments and port restrictions in China, impacting the world’s top importer. In the U.S., crude oil inventories showed mixed trends. 

The American Petroleum Institute (API) reported a drawdown of 1.455 million barrels for the week ending February 28, marking the second consecutive week of declines. However, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported a larger-than-expected inventory build of 3.614 million barrels, driven by a 1.124 million barrel increase at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub. Gasoline and distillate stockpiles, however, saw notable declines, with gasoline stocks falling by 1.433 million barrels and distillates dropping by 1.318 million barrels. On the production front, the EIA revised its outlook for U.S. crude oil output, projecting an average of 13.59 million barrels per day in 2025, slightly higher than previous estimates. 

Technically, the market is witnessing short covering as open interest fell by 20.45% to 5,486 contracts. Support is at ₹5,780, with a possible test of ₹5,701, while resistance is at ₹5,942, and a breakout could push prices towards ₹6,025.

Eqwires Research Analyst

Top-notch SEBI registered research analyst

Best SEBI registered Intraday tips provider

info@eqwires.com

Telegram Facebook Instagram

Call: +91 9624421555 / +91 9624461555

www.eqwires.com

Zomato transforms into Eternal Ltd as it expands beyond food delivery

Zomato Ltd has officially received shareholder approval to change its corporate name to Eternal Ltd, marking a significant step in the company’s bid to diversify its quick commerce operations. The food-tech giant confirmed the decision in a filing with the stock exchanges. 

However, the change only applies to the corporate entity and not to the Zomato brand or app. The company reassured users that its food delivery service would continue under the same well-known name. 

Shareholders approve name change and document modifications

In addition to the name change, shareholders also approved amendments to Zomato’s Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA). These legal documents will now reflect the new corporate identity.

The approval came through a postal ballot, as stated in the company’s official communication dated February 6 and February 7. The scrutiniser’s report detailing the voting outcome was published on March 9. 

A strategic shift for the company

This rebranding move also aligns with Zomato’s long-term vision as it expands beyond food delivery. Over the years, the company has diversified into various ventures, including Blinkit, Hyperpure, and District, reinforcing its broader tech-driven ambitions.

On February 6, Zomato’s board of directors approved the corporate name change, pending regulatory approvals. This marks a new phase of growth as the company strengthens its position across multiple sectors.

New corporate website and stock ticker

As part of this transition, Zomato will update its corporate website from zomato.com to eternal.com. Additionally, its stock ticker will change from ZOMATO to ETERNAL, aligning with the company’s evolving brand identity. 

CEO Deepinder Goyal explains the move

Zomato’s CEO, Deepinder Goyal, provided insights into the name change in a letter to shareholders. He revealed that after acquiring Blinkit, the company internally started using “Eternal” to distinguish between the corporate entity and the Blinkit brand. 

“The complete criteria for who qualifies for access will be determined at a later stage,” Goyal stated, emphasising that this strategic move reflects the company’s expanding ambitions.

What’s next for Zomato (now Eternal Ltd)?

The rebranding is expected to strengthen Zomato’s market presence and signal its commitment to long-term growth. With a focus on innovation and diversification, the company aims to maintain its leadership in the competitive food-tech and e-commerce ecosystem. 

While the name on legal documents changes, Zomato’s app, service, and brand identity remain unchanged, ensuring a seamless experience for users and partners. Zomato shares were down 1.18 per cent at Rs 214.25 apiece at 11:40 am on Monday, March 10. The stock has declined 22.01 per cent, so far, in calendar year 2025.

Eqwires Research Analyst

Top-notch SEBI registered research analyst

Best SEBI registered Intraday tips provider

info@eqwires.com

Telegram Facebook Instagram

Call: +91 9624421555 / +91 9624461555

www.eqwires.com

Gensol Engineering Falls 10% As CFO Resigns; Stock Down 73% In 9 Months: Key Reasons

Shares of Gensol Engineering continued their downward trajectory for the eighth consecutive session on Friday, March 7, as the stock plunged by 9.6%, hitting a low of Rs 303 on the BSE. The decline followed the company’s announcement that its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Ankit Jain, had resigned to “pursue other opportunities.” In an exchange filing, Gensol Engineering confirmed that Jain’s resignation was effective as of March 6, 2025, and expressed its gratitude for his contributions during his tenure.

The company also announced the appointment of Jabirmahendi Mohammedraza Aga as the new CFO. Aga, who has been with the Gensol Group, brings significant experience in corporate finance, risk management, investor relations, and financial reporting, with a proven track record of enhancing profitability and shareholder value.

Jain cited personal reasons and his pursuit of other professional avenues as the reason for his resignation from the post of CFO.

The drop in Gensol Engineering’s share price continued a losing streak that has persisted over the past seven trading sessions. Just a day earlier, on Thursday, the stock had fallen by 10%, hitting its lower circuit limit at Rs 335.35. This slide in stock price came after the company’s credit ratings were downgraded by both ICRA and CARE Ratings.

ICRA downgraded the credit ratings on various loan facilities totaling Rs 2,050 crore, including a long-term fund-based term loan of Rs 925 crore and a fund-based cash credit facility of Rs 718.5 crore, both of which were downgraded from [ICRA]BBB- (Stable) to [ICRA]D. Additionally, long-term and short-term bank guarantee facilities worth Rs 406.5 crore and a sub-limit bank guarantee of Rs 51.3 crore were also downgraded to [ICRA]D.

Similarly, CARE Ratings downgraded the credit ratings for bank facilities totaling Rs 716 crore to CARE D, signaling default or high credit risk. The long-term bank facilities of Rs 639.7 crore were downgraded from CARE BB+ (Stable) to CARE D, while the long-term/short-term bank facilities of Rs 76.3 crore were downgraded from CARE BB+ (Stable)/CARE A4+ to CARE D.

Gensol Engineering’s shares have experienced a dramatic 73% decline over the past nine months, plunging from Rs 1,126 to Rs 303.

Eqwires Research Analyst

Top-notch SEBI registered research analyst

Best SEBI registered Intraday tips provider

info@eqwires.com

Telegram Facebook Instagram

Call: +91 9624421555 / +91 9624461555

www.eqwires.com

SC stays Bombay HC order, allows Pune eatery to use ‘Burger King’ name

The Supreme Court on Friday put a stay on a recent Bombay High Court order that had barred a Pune-based restaurant from using the name ‘Burger King’, according to a report by Bar and Bench. 

With this stay, the Pune eatery can continue to operate under the disputed name until the High Court issues a final decision.   

A SC bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said, “The impugned order shall remain stayed. However, the Bombay High Court can continue to hear the appeal.” 

Earlier, the Bombay High Court overturned a Pune court’s decision, which had dismissed a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by the US-based fast-food giant Burger King Corporation against the local restaurant operating under the same name.  

‘Burger King’ case details

The legal dispute centres around Burger King Corporation, which officially entered the Indian market in 2014, and the Pune-based restaurant, which has been using the ‘Burger King’ name since 2008. The multinational chain argued that the local restaurant’s use of the name was detrimental to its brand reputation and sought a permanent injunction to prevent it from continuing under the same trademark.  

In July 2024, a Pune court ruled in favour of the local establishment, citing its earlier use of the name. The court observed that the Pune eatery had been in operation since the early 1990s, whereas Burger King Corporation registered its trademark for restaurant services in India only in 2006. Declaring the Pune restaurant a “prior and honest user” of the name, the court dismissed the US company’s claims.  

Challenging this verdict, Burger King moved the Bombay High Court, asserting that it had registered the trademark in India as early as 1979, despite launching its operations much later. Meanwhile, the local restaurant’s legal team maintained that it had been using the name since 1992, predating the US chain’s entry into the Indian market.   

Represented by senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and K Parameshwar, along with advocates Abhijit Sarwate and Anand Dilip Landge, the Pune eatery argued that it had been using the mark long before the US company entered India. They also accused the corporation of ‘squatting’ on the trademark, pointing out that Burger King had initially applied for registration only in relation to paper products, not restaurant services.  

HC’s order stayed amid legal battle

Additionally, they contended that an interim stay against a trial court’s decree could have significant repercussions, as the appeal process could take a considerable amount of time.   

On the other hand, advocate Aditya Verma, representing the US corporation, asserted that the appeal in the Bombay High Court was progressing swiftly, leaving no justification for staying the High Court’s order. He argued that allowing another restaurant to operate under the Burger King name would confuse consumers.   

The apex court, however, granted relief to the Pune-based restaurant, noting that it only operated two outlets in the city, whereas Burger King is a global brand with numerous locations. The court also acknowledged that an interim stay on the trial court’s ruling could negatively impact the affected party. Consequently, it stayed the High Court’s order. 

Eqwires Research Analyst

Top-notch SEBI registered research analyst

Best SEBI registered Intraday tips provider

info@eqwires.com

Telegram Facebook Instagram

Call: +91 9624421555 / +91 9624461555

www.eqwires.com